Curse

Ysabeth Noirelune · Aug 18, 2007, 11:15 AM // 11:15

This armor should suit your taste a little better, I think.

Shakkara · Aug 18, 2007, 11:19 AM // 11:19

I really dont like that one.

Still uncovered belly and the fur is just ugly.

Ysabeth Noirelune · Aug 18, 2007, 11:23 AM // 11:23

I do agree with you, it's ugly. However, it's quite probably all we'll got in terms of coverage. I mean, look at this one. Makes me want to sing "Roxanne".

upier · Aug 18, 2007, 11:28 AM // 11:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tijger

Oh I see.
So, what do you define as modest then? Wide fitting garment from head to toe which doesnt show any exposed skin?

Why not?
IF the player chooses to dress up in that - since we are talking about a GAME and NOT real life - fine with me.
Variety FTW!

Quote:

Originally Posted by acidic

the female players should be flattered that the dev cared so much to make those special sexy armors

That one is sweet!
Yep girls - you should be flattered that you can look like the cheapest RED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GOs in the game and that you don't need to worry about your big fat real life asses so that you can finally get a man and start throwing out kiddies!
(rolleyes emote anyone?)

So I once again fully support the option for various armours.
The game is offering a serious amount of customization - and looks are very important in terms of the whole RGP-immersion.
Options, options, options = good, good, good!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shakkara

I really dont like that one.
Still uncovered belly and the fur is just ugly.

Now this might be a bit of a problem.
If the thing you want most is a full body suit - then style comes second.

Sleeper Service · Aug 18, 2007, 11:51 AM // 11:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aera

Okay, I'll try to put this the right way:

No-one really cares, pay attention to the game not to the armour. Or stop complaining here and play another character or make a male paragon.
Problem solved, less of GWGuru's bandwidth wasted.

people do care

http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...0187417&page=1

please, continue thinking you can read minds and tell people what to do. its funny.

Kashrlyyk · Aug 18, 2007, 12:06 PM // 12:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by upier

Why not?
IF the player chooses to dress up in that - since we are talking about a GAME and NOT real life - fine with me.
Variety FTW!

That one is sweet!
Yep girls - you should be flattered that you can look like the cheapest RED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GOs in the game and that you don't need to worry about your big fat real life asses so that you can finally get a man and start throwing out kiddies!
(rolleyes emote anyone?)

So I once again fully support the option for various armours.
The game is offering a serious amount of customization - and looks are very important in terms of the whole RGP-immersion.
Options, options, options = good, good, good!

Absolutly, absolutly, absolutly.

Quote:

Originally Posted by upier

Now this might be a bit of a problem.
If the thing you want most is a full body suit - then style comes second.

read below

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tijger

Oh I see.

So, what do you define as modest then? Wide fitting garment from head to toe which doesnt show any exposed skin?

I said, there is no armor covering the complete belly! Which means an armor similar to what we have now, but covering the belly would be completly enough, like they did for the male paragon.

Obey The Cat · Aug 18, 2007, 12:09 PM // 12:09

a paragon male looks like a RED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GOing super gay.

females in reality are more sexy than males too. why not in a fantasy game too.

Quote:

http://img245.imageshack.us/img245/1818/gw545jy1.jpg

GREAT! <3

Shakkara · Aug 18, 2007, 12:09 PM // 12:09

I said it on the first post grrr, why ask again, tijger?

* Belly
* Area between and above the boobs, no clevage dammit!
* Neck
* Arms from elbow to wrist
* Feet and legs upto the knee
* Waist to knee
* Preferably shoulders and upper arms

Kas · Aug 18, 2007, 12:22 PM // 12:22

This topic is ridiculous.
I guess you're the folks that tell me in real-life to go and dress in something proper. Here is the shocking news: It's 2007, no longer 1200. I'm really sorry for you but times have changed.
What is the problem about revealing armor or clothes? Is it morales? Once again, wake up and enjoy the new Millenium. Is it for realism? Yeah, tell me about realism, but please wait until after i've had my sit in with that dragon over there and poked him with my flame spitting sword. Oppression from males? No really?
The whole reason we can finally wear something revealing is because the oppression is dwindling. It's not the evil drooling man that tells us to wear sexy dresses, we do wear them because we CAN. A funny thing is that I see mostly MEN complain about women showing too much (in Real-life too). Is it because you then can plainly see you're losing your control over the other gender? Oops.

So what else is there really? Any argument left that isn't based on morales from the middle-ages or something similiar silly?

Xanthar · Aug 18, 2007, 12:32 PM // 12:32

Let me begin by saying that I fully appreciate your wish for more coverage from the paragon armour - Choice is a beautiful thing.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shakkara

The Greeks actually wore metal or leather breastplates during those times. [SNIP] So the Greek actually DID wear practical armor.

Indeed, this is completely true. However...

(more examples)
http://imagesource5d.allposters.com/...7-FT3BD00Z.jpg
http://www.urmc.rochester.edu/Steril...es/hoplite.jpg

...practical does not always indicate that is "decent" by todays standards

Alex Silverfox · Aug 18, 2007, 12:35 PM // 12:35

you can ask for nuns in Gw2... this class may fit you. I hope they dont implement any sexy guepierre! :P

arcanemacabre · Aug 18, 2007, 12:38 PM // 12:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xanthar

Pics

So there we go. Add choices - Full coverage (or at least more coverage) armor, and an option for a nude paragon "armor". That way we cover all bases

(male and female, to be fair)

Shakkara · Aug 18, 2007, 12:42 PM // 12:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kas

This topic is ridiculous.
I guess you're the folks that tell me in real-life to go and dress in something proper. Here is the shocking news: It's 2007, no longer 1200. I'm really sorry for you but times have changed.
What is the problem about revealing armor or clothes? Is it morales? Once again, wake up and enjoy the new Millenium. Is it for realism? Yeah, tell me about realism, but please wait until after i've had my sit in with that dragon over there and poked him with my flame spitting sword. Oppression from males? No really?
The whole reason we can finally wear something revealing is because the oppression is dwindling. It's not the evil drooling man that tells us to wear sexy dresses, we do wear them because we CAN. A funny thing is that I see mostly MEN complain about women showing too much (in Real-life too). Is it because you then can plainly see you're losing your control over the other gender? Oops.

So what else is there really? Any argument left that isn't based on morales from the middle-ages or something similiar silly?

No, the problem is CHOICE. If you want to wear this stuff, fine, no problem. I don't care what you want to wear. You can do that, you can even go to a nudist camp, I don't care. I DONT want to wear this stuff, it doesn't fit me, it offends me, but I can't wear anything else. Then it becomes a problem, right?

Kas · Aug 18, 2007, 12:50 PM // 12:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shakkara

it offends me

Yep. Definitely a case of middle age morales.

ZenRgy · Aug 18, 2007, 12:51 PM // 12:51

1) It's a game.

2) It's the internet.

Why do you take it so seriously?

Diddy bow · Aug 18, 2007, 01:02 PM // 13:02

Male paras need somthing other than skirts too

Tijger · Aug 18, 2007, 01:10 PM // 13:10

Good lord, has GW been invaded by fundamentalists or something?

WTF is wrong with people?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kas

Yep. Definitely a case of middle age morales.

No, really, its nothing to do with age, I'm 43 and I have no issues with bare bellies and cleavage in bloody fantasy game which is rated at 13+

netniwk · Aug 18, 2007, 01:15 PM // 13:15

paragon=mostly in Elona
Elona=hot
hot=Clothes that cool off=revealing
TADAAA.

Tijger · Aug 18, 2007, 01:19 PM // 13:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shakkara

No, the problem is CHOICE. If you want to wear this stuff, fine, no problem. I don't care what you want to wear. You can do that, you can even go to a nudist camp, I don't care. I DONT want to wear this stuff, it doesn't fit me, it offends me, but I can't wear anything else. Then it becomes a problem, right?

Too bad you didnt execute your freedom of choice before you bought the game. All the armors available are shown on various websites, if you are this easily offended then I would expect you to perform a dilligent search when buying a game whether your sensibilities will not be upset by it.

Shadis · Aug 18, 2007, 01:30 PM // 13:30

If you want to get technical, they actually are sexy barbie dolls in digital form.